23XI/FRM has filed its response to NASCAR motion for summary judgment. “The motion is a meandering combination of mischaracterizations of Plaintiffs’ claims, misstatements of governing antitrust law, and disputed facts which must go to trial.”
23XI/FRM say case shouldn’t be thrown out because:
- NASCAR pays below-market terms to premier stock car racing teams, harming team enterprise value
- No alternative for teams because NASCAR sanction agreements keep tracks from having other stock-car events
- Cannot run Next Gen car anywhere else
23XI/FRM has filed its response to NASCAR motion for summary judgment (it was due today): "The motion is a meandering combination of mischaracterizations of Plaintiffs’ claims, misstatements of governing antitrust law, and disputed facts which must go to trial." pic.twitter.com/iIeFPL01LF
— Bob Pockrass (@bobpockrass) October 16, 2025
23XI/FRM say case shouldn't be tossed b/c:
-NASCAR pays below-market terms to premier stock car racing teams, harming team enterprise value
-No alternative for teams b/c NASCAR sanction agreements keep tracks from having other stock-car events
-Cant run Next Gen car anywhere else https://t.co/iji7tCAXJ2— Bob Pockrass (@bobpockrass) October 16, 2025
Click here to download a PDF of the filing.
264For more information see the 2024 Antitrust Lawsuit page.